Skip to main content
GST measure is a step toward closing Canada’s rental housing gap

Responding to demands from the development community and recommendations from housing analysts, Canada’s Federal government announced Thursday that it will eliminate GST on the construction of new rental apartments. Effective immediately, the new tax regime is said to be part of a suite of incentives intended to build more homes and enhance housing affordability in Canada. With rental vacancy rates at a two-decade low, and Canada’s rental housing stock sitting in a severe shortage, any measure to boost rental apartment construction is certainly welcome.

The 5% GST on new rental construction (including land value and construction costs) discouraged developers from pursuing purpose-built rental apartment projects. In fact, developers have long preferred to build condominiums over rental housing projects on the basis of higher profitability and the possibility to reinvest proceeds into subsequent construction projects. Since tenants aren’t obligated to pay the 5% GST on top of their regular rent, developers are typically left holding the tax bill. GST on condos, on the other hand, is generally baked into the purchase price of the unit, allowing the builder to offload the tax burden onto the new homebuyer.

While the removal of GST on rental construction projects will improve their financial viability – and with it, hopefully spur more development – it isn’t likely to lower rents in short order. With Canada’s rental market in a severe deficit position, and given the time it takes to build new supply, the measure won’t be a silver bullet. More policy action – at all levels of government – will be needed to really move the needle on rental supply and affect rent. This includes modernizing zoning by-laws to accommodate high density development, streamline the permitting prices for new construction, and ensure other fees, taxes, and policies are in line with the broader goal of expanding the rental housing stock in Canada.


Rachel Battaglia is an economist at RBC. She is a member of the Macro and Regional Analysis Group, providing analysis for the provincial macroeconomic outlook.

This article is intended as general information only and is not to be relied upon as constituting legal, financial or other professional advice. The reader is solely liable for any use of the information contained in this document and Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”) nor any of its affiliates nor any of their respective directors, officers, employees or agents shall be held responsible for any direct or indirect damages arising from the use of this document by the reader. A professional advisor should be consulted regarding your specific situation. Information presented is believed to be factual and up-to-date but we do not guarantee its accuracy and it should not be regarded as a complete analysis of the subjects discussed. All expressions of opinion reflect the judgment of the authors as of the date of publication and are subject to change. No endorsement of any third parties or their advice, opinions, information, products or services is expressly given or implied by Royal Bank of Canada or any of its affiliates. This document may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of certain securities laws, which are subject to RBC’s caution regarding forward- looking statements. ESG (including climate) metrics, data and other information contained on this website are or may be based on assumptions, estimates and judgements. For cautionary statements relating to the information on this website, refer to the “Caution regarding forward-looking statements” and the “Important notice regarding this document” sections in our latest climate report or sustainability report, available at: https://www.rbc.com/community-social- impact/reporting-performance/index.html. Except as required by law, none of RBC nor any of its affiliates undertake to update any information in this document.

Read This Next